
Medford’s
Site Plan and Architectural Commission stuck by an earlier decision not to require
Wal-Mart to do a comprehensive traffic study before building a 205,693-square-foot
Supercenter. The decision was the latest of several meetings and hearings about
the project, which the site plan commission approved but the City Council rejected
in 2004. Wal-Mart appealed to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals, which returned
the issue to the council, which sent it back to the commission.
IT’S NOT OVER! Residents and business owners must urge the City Council to ask
Wal-Mart for an adequate traffic study to analyze the impacts of almost 9,000
additional car trips per day in the already congested South Medford I-5 Interchange
area.
June 2008... Medford City Council sends the Wal-Mart case back to the Site Plan and Architectural Review Commission (SPAC). This will include a public hearing -- check back for more information when this is scheduled.
Medford
Citizens for Responsible Development
May 22, 2006 Press Release
City Council to consider Wal-Mart traffic study: Citizen group launches petition drive
Medford Citizens for Responsible Development have launched a petition drive to ask the Medford City Council to require a comprehensive traffic study for the Wal-Mart Supercenter. The group has appealed the recent decision by the Medford’s Site Plan and Architectural Committee’s (SPAC) decision not to require a traffic study for the proposed 200,000sf Supercenter at Miles Field. The issue goes back to the Medford City Council on June 1 where the citizen group will urge for analysis of the impacts of almost 9,000 additional car trips per day in the already congested South Medford I-5 Interchange area, as required by Medford City Code.
“Traffic in that area is already so bad that taxpayers are poised to spend $75 million on the new interchange. If Wal-Mart is allowed to build there, the additional traffic will overwhelm the planned south Medford interchange and we will have gridlock once again,” said Shareen Vogel, a spokesperson for the group.
The group is circulating a petition that supports a comprehensive study of any new development that would create a significant impact to local roads. The canvassing effort will target local neighborhoods that would be impacted by the traffic, and hundreds of signatures have already been gathered. The petition is available for download from the group’s website, www.medfordcitizens.org, and can also be signed at Christian’s Pharmacy in downtown Medford.
“A comprehensive traffic
study must be required before this project can proceed. If the study shows
the current system will fail, then developers – not taxpayers – should pay
for needed improvements.” added Vogel.
April 10, 2006 Press Release
City Council to consider Wal-Mart traffic study: Citizen group says city is ignoring traffic nightmare
Medford Citizens for Responsible Development will ask the Medford City Council to require a comprehensive traffic study for the Wal-Mart Supercenter as is required by Medford City Code. On Friday, the citizen group appealed the March 17 decision of the Medford’s Site Plan and Architectural Committee’s (SPAC) decision not to require a traffic study for the Wal-Mart Supercenter at Miles Field. The appeal sends the issue to the Medford City Council on June 1 where the citizen group will urge the City Council to ask Wal-Mart for an adequate traffic study to analyze the impacts of almost 9,000 additional car trips per day in the already congested South Medford I-5 Interchange area.
Medford Citizens
is also challenging the city’s procedure in limiting testimony during the
SPAC hearings. No section of the Medford Municipal Code, and no state statute,
permits the city to deny CRD the right to present legal argument on traffic
at these proceedings. To the extent that CRD has been denied the opportunity
to address these matters, and even to speak to the question of whether it
is entitled to address these matters, its due process and procedural rights
have been denied, and it has been substantially prejudiced. SPAC should have
permitted CRD to present its arguments on traffic to the record, and to address
footprint and orientation testimony on the issue of compatibility.
February 20, 2006 Press Release
Local
group continues fight against Wal-Mart:
Concerns include impacts to traffic & little public involvement
Last
year the City Council rejected plans for a 207,000 square-foot Wal-Mart Super
Center at Miles Field along Highway 99 at Center Drive. Now after months of
secret meetings with city planning staff, Wal-Mart is trying to sneak its
huge building into town without an adequate traffic study. A grassroots organization
of community residents and business owners is working to ensure public involvement
in the process.
Medford Citizens for Responsible Development formed to organize opposition
to the development, and plans to speak at Tuesday’s Site Plan and Architectural
Review Commission meeting at noon at City Hall. Our goals are to raise awareness
of the proposal and organize community involvement in the decision.
“Our mission is to educate the community about the proposed development and
the potential impacts, and encourage community involvement in the decision.”
said Shareen Fiol, a spokesperson for the group. “We are determined to protect
the gateway to Medford’s and encourage development that best serves the entire
community.”
Concerns include the impact on existing traffic problems, compatibility with
adjacent buildings and effects on local business. The groups’ latest efforts
include an informational website, www.medfordcitizens.org. Wal-Mart estimates
the Supercenter would generate an 8,755 additional vehicle trips per day,
but their study says nothing about the impact of these trips on intersections
surrounding the site or on the future I-5 interchange. The Oregon Department
of Transportation wrote in a letter to the city that the Wal-Mart traffic
study was “inadequate.”
The Site Planning & Architectural Committee hearing is scheduled for noon
on Tuesday, February 21st , a move the group says restricts citizen input.
“City meetings should be held when working citizens can attend. Not in the
middle of the work day.” The meeting also conflicts with the all-day Workforce
Housing Summit which will prevent many city leaders from attending the hearing.
Past News Articles
Mail Tribune